Add support for percolate during Bulk Index operation #274
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…g returned if you requested to percolate the doc
Mpdreamz
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2013
Add support for percolate during Bulk Index operation
Member
|
Awesome, this feature of the _bulk call was completely off my radar! Thanks @daflookie |
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously in NEST you could request to percolate during a bulk index operation, but the items collection did not contain a property for the list of matches that ES returns in it's response. I needed that for a scenario of mine and thought it may be useful to others as well.
FYI I'm a new to git and nunit so if there is a different recommended approach or series of tests you would like I can try to incorporate those.
Thanks!